Global Moderator Color

[ForeverZer0]

I would debate, but this is far too trivial for me to even waste the time on. I see merit in both views, though I still think simply reading the word "Moderator" only takes 0.1 seconds longer to identify than a color code.

[tSwitch]

I would debate, but this is far too trivial for me to even waste the time on. I see merit in both views, though I still think simply reading the word "Moderator" only takes 0.1 seconds longer to identify than a color code.

With around three lines of text beneath an individual's name, you clearly understand how the system works, and are in the 1% that has 99% of said understanding.

[ForeverZer0]

I would debate, but this is far too trivial for me to even waste the time on.

[Vell]

Namkcor has a point in that it'd cause some short-term POTENTIAL issues with members unaware of things. But on the same boat, f0 is right - the issue is rather trivial. More, I stress short-term. In the long run, new members would see the new color and not be aware of the old; current members would adapt in time. Therefore, there's little reason I find to object.

Post not eloquent due to whatever.

[winkio]

Pretty sure NAMK is trolling.  There's no way he is serious about color changes being a big deal.

[Blizzard]

The only colors changed were Mod and GMod. The number of gems is still the same.

[tSwitch]

Pretty sure NAMK is trolling.  There's no way he is serious about color changes being a big deal.

Hardstyle.