'Relationships', and the maturity of people as a whole

[fugibo]

Ulta, that's like saying cooking bacon is complex, just because a starving African couldn't do it.

My analogies fail really hard.

[Valcos]

Yeah... I have no clue what you are trying to say there

[fugibo]

I'm saying that just because something's kinda scary and unusual at first, that doesn't mean that there's anything "complex" about it.

[Seox]

Ulta, that's like saying cooking bacon is complex, just because a starving African couldn't do it.

My analogies fail really hard.

Also true, actually.

I guess it's all subjective. Meh.

[Valcos]

I'm saying that just because something's kinda scary and unusual at first, that doesn't mean that there's anything "complex" about it.

... o.O

[Blizzard]

You're all right. Sure, there are things that seem complex, but they aren't complex at all. I consider coding to be complex. Just because I know it, doesn't mean it's not complex. But there are things that are simple. They are even obvious. Psychology is actually simple. It's just the uncertain stuff that confuses people. It's not simple to get the grip of it, but as soon as you know what's going on, you know it all. On the other side some people simply can't get the grip of it and that's it.

@FL: Yeah, Thinkpad was Lenovo/IBM, right. >.< Sorry about that.

[Vell]

well, that is an excellent point you make. I suppose breaking into the thought pattern allowing psychological interpretation is the complex part.

[Blizzard]

It's definitely much harder if you have no help or if you don't read about it.

[Seox]

well, that is an excellent point you make. I suppose breaking into the thought pattern allowing psychological interpretation is the complex part.

But what about those people who seem almost "predisposed" towards something? They don't really "break" anything. It seems like they were always there.

So I guess the argument here is, is it nature or nurture that allows us the skills that we have? Practice aside, which one decides the answer?

[Blizzard]

But what about those people who seem almost "predisposed" towards something? They don't really "break" anything. It seems like they were always there.

The just seem to have never "broken in" because they are that good. Also, back on topic.

[Vell]

split it into intelligent debate, I wanna continue this.

Note: I have nothin else to say on topic unless someone calls up somethin i can debate.

[fugibo]

Is premarital sex morally right?

[Calintz]

I suppose that would depend on the person's morals.

[Seox]

I suppose that would depend on the person's morals.

XD, wouldn't that be circular, although true, logic?


It's right if it's right to you. Therefore, that's not what should be debated. If it practical? Is it practical for the relationship? No. Because of the fact that, then you have ambiguities as far as children and etc, it is not practical. And to the relationship? No. Because then, you both attribute less value to sex, each other, the relationship, and virtue. And all of those, later on, lead to significantly higher divorce rates.
COUGH
cough

co-America-ugh.

Cough


Excuse me.

[Blizzard]

I suppose that would depend on the person's morals.

Haha, good one.

I'd rather say it depends on the religion. :/

[Calintz]

and if you're an atheist?

[Blizzard]

Atheism is a religion.

[fugibo]

and if you're an atheist?

I actually had a similar thought as soon as I read Blizz's post.

New phrasing:
"Is fornication morally right for atheists?"

Loophole that, plox.

[Seox]

and if you're an atheist?

I actually had a similar thought as soon as I read Blizz's post.

New phrasing:
"Is fornication morally right for atheists?"

Loophole that, plox.

Well, I guess that would depend on what octane gas you put into your car.    :V


Hmmmm....my last post only went for "is it practical/good for the people and relationship." In the moral case? Since atheists have no religious edict, they are technically free to choose. Meaning, as Cal said, it really does depend on THEIR morals. Since most of them don't really think either way, I'd be led to say No, even though I disagree with it. Meh.