@Lob & Blizz: Thanks
@Vexus: I'm just going to write down my thoughts on this
I like empty spaces.
It's nice to have some space to walk around in, right? I personaly don't think that every map have to have a detail put out between every 3th frame and i like when it's open and free. Whenever i leave a place empty i usualy just fill it in with some objekt that you can normally pass through, like a flower or a book or something like that. I don't only focus on what looks best, i mostly focus on what could be real.
I mean, usualy a room have a lot of space in the middle of it so you can walk through it, right?
I try to think on a realistic level more than the normal: "It looks bad, change it so my eyes can be pleased."
I'm sorry, but i am not going to fill my maps with random stuff just because it looks better with less space. I am going to look out my window and analyze how much empty space there should really be and how maps can be more realistic.
-I mean, just because it's unecessary to walk on a specific area(Maybe a big lawn), does it mean i should remove it? Is the owner of the house now allowed to have a big lawn?
-Is the town not allowed to be big and leave a lot of space for nature? (As you see in the screenshots. The city likes to leave a lot of space for fields of grass and flowers. It just looks pretty and i think it would in reality too)
Don't get me wrong, I usually listen to critisicm/feedback. However this...
I just felt the need to write this. It bothered me greatly