Sorry, not internet, It'll take a while..
Blizz: I'm not really using analogies like the one you used, because the world killing itself, the animals and plants and organisms like that, killing themselves would NOT do good for the world. That's pretty much the opposite of what I'm going for and what I'm trying to achieve. I want to help the world, and the human species is one organism that does not do that, so that's why it can go to hell.
kagutsuchi: yeah, we got lots technology and achievements, yet what exactly has that done for the world/nature besides fuck it up? Pollution didn't exist before humanity did.
Well, duh, the stereotypical argument would be to want to live. And who the hell said I didn't want to live? I'm saying what humanity should do, not what it will do. I definitely don't so all the things I should do.
Yes, definitely, pollution and natural resources are obviously the main points of what I'm trying to get across: before humanity, mainly civilization, existed, there was no pollution or wasting of natural resources. These things harm the world. The very atmosphere has changed because of human existence/interference. As long as this civilization continues, the world's going to suffer. The sea's not infinite, you know, nothing is. As long as humanity exists, pollution, destruction, mass killings of organism will still exist, and no one's going to do anything about it because everyone's too lazy.
PS: That everyone includes me, duh.