Chaos Project

Well, here I come again, asking if Decisive media can affiliate with CP. Of course, not the same site as before, so I think a new topic will do just fine.

Decisive Media is fairly active, and it seems like this time, we'll stay as such and grow bigger. A major reboot, I'd say. :D



So if you'd like to affiliate, Blizz, awesome. If not, at least I asked. xD

IDK, what do you understand under "fairly active"?

Quote from: Blizzard on July 27, 2011, 12:59:18 pm
IDK, what do you understand under "fairly active"?

I didn't quite get the question. ._.

But if it means what I think, and you're asking me my definition of the statement: I have people(besides me) posting everyday, and I can say the place went up 200+ posts since opening.
So I'd say, that if DM continues at this pace, activity will boost even more than that, and it'll be a pretty active community like other places that started a little slow(laptops & tea, rpgmakers.net, as two examples).

*scratches head* winkio, what do you think?

Yeah, winkio, what do you think? D:

(p.s. i wuv you)

I think we should wait about a month, and then affiliate if it is still active.

:3 I guess we can wait. Since we're on the topic of affiliation, could either you or Blizzard contact HBGames and have them fix their image. Its been broken for awhile and its driving me crazy. D:

Quote from: winkio on July 27, 2011, 06:20:27 pm
I think we should wait about a month, and then affiliate if it is still active.

Okay, fine. But I can guarantee it's staying active. :P

Quote from: game_guy on July 27, 2011, 06:46:58 pm
Since we're on the topic of affiliation, could either you or Blizzard contact HBGames and have them fix their image. Its been broken for awhile and its driving me crazy. D:

I don't have an account so Blizz will have to do it.

Its been near a month. Since posted, DM's gained about 80 topics and near 500 posts since July 27th. We don't have many members still but the members that do hang around are at least posting.

I'm for it.  *looks at Blizz*

Quote from: winkio on August 19, 2011, 07:55:10 pm
I'm for it.  *looks at Blizz*

<3

What exactley is decisive media for? I checked it out and wasn't sure...

Quote from: InfinateX on August 20, 2011, 02:34:07 am
What exactley is decisive media for? I checked it out and wasn't sure...

You did a good job checking it out, as it's all on the front page. Detected my sarcasm there? :/

Also, not trying to be an ass, just telling you to look at the block of text that explains what it is on the home page.

There's no way I am... Oh, wait, I already did. :=

Quote from: Blizzard on August 20, 2011, 06:34:18 am
There's no way I am... Oh, wait, I already did. :=

Why thank you, bearer of the chest jungle. <3

Whats your affiliate image again Blizzard?

(http://chaos-project.com/affiliate.png)

Okay, added it. x3

You are now the proud affiliate of child-porn.

I thought Tugger was always affiliated with child porn...

 :naughty:

Quote from: AngryPacman on August 21, 2011, 09:02:20 am
I thought Tugger was always affiliated with child porn...

You don't know it, but I will tell you right now:

I HATE it when people associate me with pedophiles.
I say it to you, because that comment was completely different than F0's in terms of what it meant.

---

Don't do it again.

He meant CP as child porn. It was a joke, one that we probably heard a hundred times already.

From what I gather, F0 meant the play on words of Chaos Project's acronym.
And Pacman pretty much meant I was "affiliated with child porn" way before this moment, which would only mean I love looking at children being raped/exploited, from what I understand. But hey, this could just be my inability to see people's true intentions in play here. :S

Based purely on written text? Trust me, inability doesn't have closely as much to do with it as does lack of actual information in communication.
You can't read minds, you don't know what he was actually thinking when he wrote that. You can only assume. Even in a real life conversation, you can never be sure, you can always only assume. Except if a person is a notorious liar and hides their motives with such good acting that you can't tell their true intentions, then you're screwed. But usually it's obvious what people are really trying to say.

Ah, yes. Okay, makes sense. Thanks. :)

Did I make trouble? Sowwy.
:(

@Pacman: Tuggernuts isn't mad at you anymore. You stuck up for Decisive Media over at RMRK when that Gaara fag came into my topic there. We both thank you for that. :3