I didn't flame at all, but then again, I know you wouldn't be putting words into someone else's mouth, so I'll assume that was directed at either yourself or nobody in particular.
Taking another trip back to the quotemobile:
Quote from: Tuggernuts on October 22, 2011, 12:20:33 am
Or are you saying, that the whole thing, including the jab at bronies, is a joke? If that was, then I can safely say that Fox successfully ruined their image over the years, to the point that they will always look dumb, joking or not.
Notice you use an 'If - then' structure in your second statement. The 'then' half of the statement refers to Fox ruining their image. The 'if' half refers to 'that', and we find from the previous statement that 'that' is the possibility of the whole segment being a joke. Therefore, you are directly linking the possibility of the segment being a joke to Fox News ruining their image. You did not include the vague 'tons of stuff before this' from you last post. The statement I quoted was about exactly one thing - the jab at bronies.
Now perhaps you meant to say that differently, or made a mistake and did not realize it. The English language can be a tricky thing, and I'm sure with more careful attention and practice, these errors will become less common.
And finally, Fox were the other people I'm talking about, and they do count as people that are not you. This incident will have no significant effect on Fox compared to other much larger incidents they have had in the past.
So now that you have the full explanation of my already simple and clear post, you must surely agree with me and thank me for my time and effort. Please, it was nothing, I expect to have to provide these one sided services in every human exchange, as there is simply no way to know what anyone else is saying without it.